雅思写作题目之科研是否该被政府垄断

2018-10-26 19:14:24 来源：网络 作者：Alice

初看雅思写作题目，有些同学可能有点不知如何下手，毕竟“科学研究”这个词离自己日常关注的内容还是稍微远了点。

　　本文为大家带来雅思写作题目之科研是否该被政府垄断：Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　雅思写作去模版范文解析：

　　初看雅思写作题目，有些同学可能有点不知如何下手，毕竟“科学研究”这个词离自己日常关注的内容还是稍微远了点。不过，也不难想象，开展一项科研很重要的一点就是资金支持，而这如果找政府一般是比较靠谱。因此针对此题，我们必须肯定政府出钱的作用。但科研又不像其他实体生产制造企业光有了钱就可以马上投产，更重要的或者说*重要的是有创造性的人才，所以主体段我们还要强调科研*重要的因素是什么，而这个因素—创造性人才和其赖以生存的自由研发环境通常在私人企业更具备。

　　雅思写作去模版范文：

　　As can be argued, government rules can easily become obstacles to scientific achievements. Usually, most of the world's headline-making scientific discoveries do not come through governmental establishments, admitting that fiscal funding is often essential to helping such success to happen in the private sector. It is false to suggest that the government should carry out and control scientific research because the issue is not only about money but also brains.

　　可以说，政府规章很容易成为科学成就的障碍。通常，*上大部分的新闻标题都不是通过政府机构来进行的，承认财政资助对于帮助私营部门的成功是非常重要的。建议政府实施和控制科学研究是错误的，因为这个问题不仅是金钱问题，而且是大脑问题。

　　Just because public funds matter, it does not follow that the government should restrict that kind of freedom of thinking which is vital to imaginative minds. Apart from that, nothing is more naive than for the government to play the role of police and rule research activities. Yes, freedom—that is how scientific breakthroughs are born. It goes without saying that probably billions of government's money may be needed to carry out research projects in various scientific fields, but it must be considered that great scientists tend to ignore, or even go against the rules. Indeed, it is hard to imagine how many scientific discoveries could have been missed as a result of unnecessary regulations. To put it strongly, control is the death of scientific research.

　　正因为公共资金的重要性，它并不意味着政府应该限制这种对想象力丰富的思维自由。除此之外，没有什么比政府扮演警察和规则研究活动更幼稚的了。是的，这就是科学突破的自由。不言而喻，可能需要数十亿政府的资金来在不同的科学领域开展研究项目，但必须考虑到，伟大的科学家往往忽视，甚至违背规则。的确，很难想象，由于不必要的规章制度，有多少科学发现可能被遗漏。有力地说，控制是科学研究的死亡。

　　Scientific research should not be forced in any event. It is because a research problem is less likely to be solved by any apparatus which money can buy than to be solved by the brains of a free head that money cannot always buy. Thus, it does not seem proper for official amateurs to "know" what on earth scientists are doing. Otherwise, it would not be called "research" in the real sense of the word. Trying to heavily monitor scientific brains is perhaps a dangerous attitude since the consequence is always too much foliage and too little fruit. That can explain in part why the government ought to shift most of the pledged fiscal spending from the public to the private sector.

　　无论如何，科学研究不应该被强迫。这是因为一个研究问题不太可能由金钱能买到的任何装置来解决，而更不可能由自由头脑的大脑来解决，因为金钱不能总是买到。因此，对于官方业余爱好者来说，“知道”科学家究竟在做什么似乎并不合适。否则，它就不会被称为“研究”的真正意义上的词。试图大量监控科学大脑可能是一种危险的态度，因为结果总是有太多的叶子和太少的果实。这可以部分解释为什么政府应该将*的大部分财政支出从公共部门转移到私营部门。

　　All aspects taken into account, scientific research is two things: billions and brains. With little doubt, the success in a country's scientific discoveries relies on both sufficient funding from the government and on creative minds from private companies in which pure research is worth every penny it costs. All the government has to do is grant money and expect that somewhere, something incredible is going to be known.

　　考虑到所有方面，科学研究有两件事：数十亿美元和脑力。毋庸置疑，一个国家的科学发现是否成功，既取决于政府的足够资金，也取决于私营企业的创造性思维，在私营企业中，纯粹的研究物有所值。所有政府必须做的是捐钱，并期待在某处，一些不可思议的事情将会被知晓。